🔗 Share this article

Do your LinkedIn connections recognizing you as a industry expert? Do numerous respondents praising your advice on expanding your business? Are headhunters reaching out to explore collaborations?

If not, the reason might be that you're not male.

The Test: Modifying Gender Identity to achieve Better Visibility

Numerous female professionals joined a collective professional network test this week after viral posts indicated that switching their profile gender to "male" boosted their platform visibility.

Some participants modified their professional summaries to incorporate what they termed "bro-coded" language - inserting results-driven professional jargon like "drive", "transform" and "accelerate". Anecdotally, their visibility similarly increased.

Systemic Preference Questions Raised

The improved metrics has led some to speculate whether an inherent gender bias in the platform's system favors male users who employ professional networking terminology.

Like many large social media platforms, LinkedIn employs an algorithm to decide which content are shown to which members - boosting some while suppressing others.

Company Statement

Through a company announcement, LinkedIn acknowledged the trend but stated it does not factor in "demographic information" when determining content distribution. Rather, the company explained that "numerous factors" influence how content are received.

Changing gender on your profile does not affect how your posts shows up in results or timelines.

Individual Results

Simone Bonnett, who modified her gender identifiers to "he/him" and her profile name to "Simon E", reported remarkable results.

"The statistics I'm seeing indicate a 1,600% increase in visitor traffic and a 1,300% increase in impressions," she noted.

Another professional, a marketing expert, started testing after observing her audience decrease substantially.

The Process

• First, she modified her profile gender to "man"
• Then, she used AI tools to rephrase her professional summary using "masculine-oriented" language
• Lastly, she recycled old posts with similar "assertive" language

The result was instantaneous: a 415% increase in reach within one week.

The Downside

Despite the positive results, Cornish expressed dissatisfaction with the approach.

"Previously, my posts were more personal - concise and insightful, but also warm and human," she stated. "Now, the masculine version was assertive and self-assured - like a Caucasian man swaggering around."

She discontinued the test after seven days, saying "Each day I continued, and outcomes got better, I became angrier."

Varying Outcomes

Some testers experienced favorable results. Cass Cooper who modified both her gender to "man" and her race to "white" described a reduction in visibility and engagement.

"We understand there's systemic preference, but it's extremely difficult to comprehend how it functions in specific cases or the reasons behind it," she commented.

Wider Consequences

These experiments occur alongside ongoing discussions about LinkedIn's unique role as both a professional network and social space.

Recent changes in recent months have apparently resulted in women professionals experiencing significantly reduced exposure, leading to informal experiments where the same content by men and women received vastly different audience engagement.

Technical Explanation

Per LinkedIn, the network uses artificial intelligence to categorize and distribute posts based on multiple factors, including what's shared and the user's professional identity.

The company states it regularly evaluates its systems, including "examinations of inequalities based on gender."

Company representative suggested that current reductions in certain members' visibility might stem from higher volume due to more content on the network.

Changing Landscape

As one participant observed, "bro-coding" appears to be growing on the network.

"Users typically consider LinkedIn as more businesslike and refined," she remarked. "That's changing. It's turning into increasingly competitive and less controlled."